Photo of Jordan Mallory

Jordan Mallory is an associate in the Governmental Practice in the firm's Washington, D.C. office.

 

As Russian Energy Week concluded last week, Western governments strike to the heart of Russia’s energy sector with sanctions packages to cut of revenue that funds Russia’s continued war against Ukraine. Three significant packages were announced in October 2025: the U.S.’s sanctions targeting the Russian energy sector, the UK’s latest sanctions against the Russian oil industry, and the EU’s 19ᵗʰ package of sanctions.Continue Reading Striking Russian Oil and The Ripple Effects

Update (November 2025): BIS suspended implementation of the Affiliates Rule for one year, temporarily reversing the extension of Entity List and MEU-related controls to foreign affiliates that are 50% or more owned by listed entities. In a final rule effective November 10, 2025, BIS stayed the interim rule’s amendments to the EAR until November 9, 2026, absent further extension. During the suspension period, the EAR reverts to the prior “legally distinct” test, meaning foreign affiliates are not automatically covered solely by virtue of 50% ownership. The suspension comes as result of trade negotiations with China, which we discuss our recent blog series on U.S. Trade in Asia.Continue Reading Not Your Usual Monday: BIS Adopts 50 Percent Rule for Entity List, MEU List & Related EAR Controls

The second Trump administration has come flying out of the starting blocks on international trade policy actions—imposing and rescinding, shaping and reshaping tariffs, sanctions, and export controls. The executive orders and directives have come so thick and fast that it is not always simple for businesses to chart a consistent policy direction and develop their plans to account for what might be coming next.Continue Reading A Roadmap for Export Controls? Project 2025 and the Future of U.S. Exports – Part III

The second Trump administration has come flying out of the starting blocks on international trade policy actions—imposing and rescinding, shaping and reshaping tariffs, sanctions, and export controls. The executive orders and directives have come so thick and fast that it is not always simple for businesses to chart a consistent policy direction and develop their plans to account for what might be coming next.Continue Reading A Roadmap for Export Controls? Project 2025 and the Future of U.S. Exports – Part II

The second Trump administration has come flying out of the starting blocks on international trade policy actions—imposing and rescinding, shaping and reshaping tariffs, sanctions, and export controls. The executive orders and directives have come so thick and fast that it is not always simple for businesses to chart a consistent policy direction and develop their plans to account for what might be coming next.Continue Reading A Roadmap for Export Controls? Project 2025 and the Future of U.S. Exports – Part I

On April 2, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO) imposing global reciprocal tariffs (White House Fact Sheet). The EO drew enough parallels to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act that Trump mentioned it in his Rose Garden announcement. The EO imposes a 10% baseline tariff on all imports to the United States beginning April 3, 2025.Continue Reading Blockading the Ports: U.S. Imposes 10% Global Tariff; Higher Reciprocal Tariff Rates by Country

On December 2, 2024, the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) issued a new set of regulations targeting semiconductors manufacturing equipment (SME) and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips. The updates are a part of BIS’s ongoing efforts to target semiconductors in attempt to slow down China’s advancement of AI. In the race to artificial general intelligence, advanced-node semiconductors play an outsized role in a country or company’s ability to progress.Continue Reading The Persistence of (High Bandwidth) Memory: Semiconductor Manufacturing Equipment and Korean Semiconductor Manufactures Face Harsher Restrictions Under New HBM Rules

On October 29, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) published its Proposed Rule outlining prohibitions and restrictions on certain transactions involving bulk U.S. sensitive personal data and U.S. Government-related data. As you may recall from our previous article, this rule stems from recent Executive Order (EO) 14117 on “Preventing Access to Americans’ Bulk Sensitive Personal Data and United States Government-Related Data by Countries of Concern.” The Proposed Rule has potential implications for any business that collects, retains, or deals in data on U.S. persons or certain other data relating to the U.S. Government. Here, we discuss some of the more interesting developments in the Proposed Rule and how it could affect your business.Continue Reading Data, Deals, and Diplomacy, Part II: Big Obligations for Big Data